This
poem could be a description of Spender's early life .He suffered the disability
of a club foot and a speech impediment. The use of the first person, contrasts, and ambiguity give us a
vivid picture of a child troubled by a superiority/inferiority complex.
While his parents are condescending towards the rough coarse
children, the child appears envious of their carefree liberty, their unbridled
animal prowess and uninhibited playfulness, yet resentful of their bullying
behaviour to him.
We can visualise the narrator’s voice through antithesis. He is everything that they are not; softly
spoken “words like stones”, well dressed “torn clothes”, “rags”, passive “they
ran and climbed”, inhibited - modesty “they stripped by country streams”,
weak “muscles of iron”, well mannered “salt coarse pointing” lisp (parodied by
copying), clumsy “lithe”, and friendly ( hostile- “they never smiled”).
His attempts at conciliation and
acceptance are refused but he appears to blame his parents for psychologically
damaging him by over protection or shielding him from a natural
childhood. While their superior attitude has excluded him from mainstream
society he undecidedly identifies with his parents by having the boys spring
“like dogs to bark at our world”.
In conclusion the
author leaves us with the idea of an ambiguous blame with the reader trying to find who
has more blame, the child or his parents. But in fact the boy is too young to have account of his own thoughts, he just follows what his parents say.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario